stones Milestones I went to the site of Rolling Stone Italy with the idea of \u200b\u200breading a bit 'old-fashioned. I begin to feel tired in front of the bare and identical lists of feeds, and ordered death, categorized in groups or individuals. I allow myself a
true reading of Internet users in bounding between the graphics and photos and I end up in the "Cover gallery
"
Mick Jagger and Madonna, to be young, gentlemen.
Iggy Pop after passing the golden age, now almost parchment like ten or twenty years ago.
A nice package of 00 flour, pop art after
Gee-Obey queued to 2009.
on John Lennon and Jimi Hendrix did not want to say a word, there are every year and most will not speak ill of the dear departed.
The reunion, Pearl Jam. A flicker of interest. Bravi. There are no
but in August and September the cover went to Patti Smith
(or even to Iggy Pop, who is the differences?) and Snoopy (beagle best ever, do not blame you anymore).
Wait a minute, but two thirds of 2010 current year, there's really no one to whom to dedicate a new cover, even in the movie? A pop star, two un'attricetta money, a designer, a scandal, a cover band, a DJ, a birthday cake?
Oh I forgot, the barn at the top right of the Italian people in Elisa is a revolutionary step.
Rolling Stone magazine is a classic Italian style and educational to a certain point, who have not much innovation in music is moving away from the filler content to fossilize over old characters. Ancient, is not their fault that they put the pictures from young people, if they had bought for different photos, little notes, drawings, photos of people who listen to music I would bow to the evergreens. Instead I feel like when I see teenagers on the subway with sleeveless garments, but with patches of Deep Purple and Def Leppard: but do not make some stuff for you at short intervals?
Having to use "the tools to express appreciation," I can not find, I would vote 2006.
